From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Sep  2 21:11:30 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA09805
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 21:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from SchematiX.net (schematix.net [24.234.31.158])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA09790
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 21:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from scott@SchematiX.net)
Received: from localhost (scott@localhost)
	by SchematiX.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA00317;
	Wed, 2 Sep 1998 21:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from scott@SchematiX.net)
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 21:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott <scott@SchematiX.net>
To: Don <don@calis.BlackSun.org>
cc: Frank Terhaar-Yonkers <fty@cisco.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 8mm tape block size max - changed?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980902222103.10084A-100000@calis.BlackSun.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809022106340.315-100000@SchematiX.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Most people don't bother to upgrade since their systems work perfectly
fine using the old versions. Just a matter of personal preference or
whether or not one has the luxury to rebuild the system.

On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Don wrote:

> > I recently upgraded from 2.0.x where I routinely used a block size of
> > 128b with tar and dump.  Using 2.1.7 
> Why are there so many older freebsd installations around? Isnt FreeBSD up
> to version 2.2.7-STABLE?
> 
> -don
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message