From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 11:26:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764A316A401 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 11:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.dieringer@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B92B113C465 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 11:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.dieringer@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 May 2007 11:26:37 -0000 Received: from c-134-225-153.d.dsl.de.ignite.net (EHLO dieringer.dyndns.org) [62.134.225.153] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 02 May 2007 13:26:37 +0200 X-Authenticated: #21464393 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19khfIR8DlkmZgvZaJYGPvgUpHTFnNVD9I1rvudAD 3WPqo0ZgJ3P5tV Received: (qmail 3305 invoked by uid 1001); 2 May 2007 11:26:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 May 2007 11:26:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:26:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Dieringer To: John Walthall In-Reply-To: <20070502020319.GB6419@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Message-ID: <20070502132330.U860@thinkpad.dieringer.dyndns.org> References: <20070501204548.L860@thinkpad.dieringer.dyndns.org> <20070502020319.GB6419@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clock too slow - big time offset with ntpdate X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Dieringer List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 11:26:39 -0000 On Wed, 2 May 2007, John Walthall wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:50:10PM +0200, Martin Dieringer wrote: >> I think it has to do with powerd, if I kill that, the time stays correct. > > With powerd enabled, are you able to maintain a "reasonably" > correct time with frequent NTP syncronizations? Sorry if it's just > me, but I am not quite clear about that, from what has been written > already. I would have to update every minute at least and would still be more than 5 seconds off. m.