From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 16:26:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08468A972B3 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD30215C1 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-244-25.knology.net [216.186.244.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u11GQR30005931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:26:28 -0600 Subject: Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports References: <56AF81BF.8050707@hiwaay.net> Cc: FreeBSD toolchain mailing list !!!! From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <56AF8733.3010906@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:31:57 -0553.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 16:26:33 -0000 On 02/01/16 10:18, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > Hi William, > > You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then > check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile > > You're correct, if graphite *is* a default option, the package should > have it . Only other thing I can think of is a silent graphite build > failure that isn't fatal, resulting in a built but incomplete package. > Unlikely all else being equal though > > Let us know what you find > > ./koobs > > On 2 Feb 2016 3:06 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" > wrote: > > > > I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which > installed the newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the > pkg-provided GCC5, it doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no > auto-parallelization. When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. > it shows graphite enabled. I am recompiling it as I write this, > but I thought the pkg was/is configured from the port & would have > graphite enabled by default, w/ no recompile needed on my part, no > ? I have the various other pkg's req'd for graphite support > pkg-installed (& just updated this A.M.), so I thought I was ready > to go. Not a huge issue, but recompiling the compiler shoots about > an hour on my box, would be sweet to avoid that. TIA for any clues > & have a good one. > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org > mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > The *ports* version looks AOK, Makefile dated Jan 31, & 'make showconfig' says graphite is ready to go. When it gets done, I'll try to compile some code w/ it & verify it is AOK. I just didn't know why the *pkg* version was different. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.