From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 17 21:27:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCCD1065677 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 21:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7238FC14 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 21:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1528663fxm.13 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gQlFCUQZGCTeWgG6XAkROcGqKIsi4KxItdnU+RqCavA=; b=Ei9EYAR7epKc90dbghesGOQ1DtxKsbXjP5DqlFtcaNpAVsN96a885G2IWhnT59ojFv d21LKbkgsoTyYGwy/dU7LFF3CGbNnMkKYswC6begQnD9UeUDRWEb1o6dEj2QLuXRO3rV oFIqDwTD+oozwlIZNk3ph784KT4aF2rm17rf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BKMAcfiZBkHVu62fT2jJLZjd7RmxTi1qsX+V63962qVl/Ho+0qEiIlJdqmkdjNzVRm WEOcVewh1FSL2BJPsUzA7LvAPvCaUMtd/f3eFUUvH3LkV+xm3+4grsYQLzivdtdBed37 AsQzJmCYaiCsUYMmR7p/w2kxnHDVr+EcWqa+s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.140.4 with SMTP id g4mr98739bku.170.1274131625119; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.25.139 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BF161A0.7050600@gmail.com> References: <4BE69E93.3090401@gmail.com> <4BE9BB35.203@gmail.com> <4BF15FA8.9040508@gmail.com> <4BF161A0.7050600@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:27:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: Anselm Strauss To: Ondrej Majerech Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox: no network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 21:27:06 -0000 I'm using the default adapter, that's the intel desktop one I think. Establishing the connection with DHCP is indeed a bit inconsistent. Sometimes it's there just after boot, sometimes it scans for half a minute before making the connection. No problems with DNS. So far I tested browsing and software updates, worked pretty well. I have not yet done extensive networking or used it for very long time. On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Ondrej Majerech wrote: > Ondrej Majerech wrote: > >> Anselm Strauss wrote: >> >>> I switched to NAT networking for now. It doesn't require any modules to >>> load >>> besides the vboxdrv.ko and runs stable so far. Only strange that ICMP is >>> not >>> working ... >>> >>> >> NAT networking doesn't work for me. Which Adapter Type are you using? And >> did you have to do any further configuration or did it jsut work >> out-of-the-box? >> >> ~ Ondra >> > > Ah, wait. > > The connection partly does work with the default settings. ICMP doesn't > work for me either, so testing with ping gave me "false" negative. Also, > DHCP-configured DNS resolver doesn't work for me -- I had to type in a DNS > server IP address manually. That way, Firefox running on Ubuntu inside VBox > can finally load pages. > > ~ Ondra >