From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 24 18:44:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FEF37B6A2 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:44:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.0.0.27] ([24.7.223.67]) by femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010125024408.YBUC18735.femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[192.0.0.27]> for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:44:08 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: ralph99@mail.voicenet.com Message-Id: Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:44:08 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ralph Dratman Subject: Re: inetd services very slow to respond (REPLACING PREVIOUS POST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Y'all, (AGAIN...) The name resolution is fast in both directions, whether to or from the slow machine. There's no apparent delay. Here's another twist to the story: I stopped inetd and started it again with -dl (debugging and logging to standard output) flags. Now the services are operating without delay! C'mon, group, this is a QUESTION... (Did activity on this list suddenly go away or is that just my imagination? I just joined the list, then received about 75 posts from Tuesday and only ONE, so far, from Wednesday, and it's almost the end of the day.) Ralph Dratman P.S. OOPS! I just re-read my original post and here's a correction: I'm running FreeBSD 3.3, not 2.2 as I incorrectly stated in that message. ============== >Sounds like DNS problems. What happens if you execute the following on >the slow machine, > > % host > >Where the IP address or hostname is that of a machine that you connect >from. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message