From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon May 5 13:29:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA17711 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA17703 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 13:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA14148; Mon, 5 May 1997 22:21:46 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA09010; Mon, 5 May 1997 22:04:36 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970505220436.AR20558@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 22:04:36 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: bazilio@economic.acnit.ac.ru (Vasily V. Grechishnikov) Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS server and NFS lkm conflicts ? References: X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: ; from Vasily V. Grechishnikov on May 5, 1997 16:44:41 +0400 Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Vasily V. Grechishnikov wrote: > I have 2.2R. I need NFS server on my machine. I recompile my > kernel without option NFS and try to use NFS as LKM . At startup (I can't say much to this, i never really tried to use the NFS LKMs.) > And second question: LKM vs. static, what better ? Is LKM > pageable ? All kernel memory is non-pageable. Given your troubles with the LKM, and the fact that you're probably never going to unload it ever again over the lifetime of your system, static is likely better. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)