From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 09:42:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5DDE00 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF0F6CF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLrIj-0004YL-Cm; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:42:45 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, libarchive-discuss@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0? References: <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:42:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 12f61b0c8dc8dcc8c992b8e1fde77987 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:42:48 -0000 On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:43:28 +0100, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: >>> I wonder why >>> >>> bsdtar --one-file-system >>> >>> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention o= f >>> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :( >>> >> >> --one-file-system >> (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points. >> >> Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Wa= s >> it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're >> seeing. > > Before it would archive the directory where the other filesystem was = > mounted, but nothing else. > > Now it doesn=E2=80=99t archive that directory. > > I believe this is a bug, since that directory (but nothing in it or = > under it) still belongs to this filesystem... > > Warner I cc'ed libarchive-discuss@googlegroups.com for more exposure to the iss= ue. Ronald.