From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jul 24 01:11:39 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA28395
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 01:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zed.ludd.luth.se (root@zed.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA28355
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 01:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zen.ludd.luth.se (zen.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.34]) by zed.ludd.luth.se (8.7.5/8.7.2) with ESMTP id KAA05214; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 10:10:59 +0200
From: Joakim Henriksson <murduth@ludd.luth.se>
Received: (murduth@localhost) by zen.ludd.luth.se (8.6.11/8.6.11) id KAA01568; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 10:10:58 +0200
Message-Id: <199607240810.KAA01568@zen.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: gcc 2.7.2 + binutils 2.7 on stable?
To: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 10:10:57 +0200 (EET DST)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199607240429.VAA00920@austin.polstra.com> from "John Polstra" at Jul 23, 96 09:29:19 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> As another option:  Reportedly, it's not that hard to get just the
> assembler from binutils working for FreeBSD.  Our linker seems to
> support weak symbols, so if you can get the binutils assembler working,
> then you should be able to use it with the stock gcc-2.7.2 and the
> native linker.

Yeah, the assembler isn't to hard to compile. But g++ still generates code that
the native ld can't handle :( But gcc seems to behave.

regards/ Joakim