From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 06:47:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CD916A417 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QY=fb6a7609@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0410713C45B for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QY=fb6a7609@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231F31642F8 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 01:18:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C540ED0501 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 01:18:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:18:13 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071201061813.2a0e35e2@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071201044427.38bd2c84@asus.freeode.co.uk> References: <20071201044427.38bd2c84@asus.freeode.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: What's the point of the shell choice in single user mode? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:47:00 -0000 On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 04:44:27 +0000 John Murphy wrote: > I've just successfully done the world and kernel upgrade from 7 beta2 > to beta3. I've always had a mergemaster phobia, but it didn't seem too > bad this time. I thought I'd broken it after choosing /bin/tcsh as my > shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and > then gave me a "simple shell" with a % prompt. > ... > I'll know to always accept the suggested /bin/sh in future, but I was > wondering if the only reason a choice of a different shell is offered > is to scare the unwary. Selecting /bin/[t]csh always works for me.