From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Nov 21 18: 1:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DA337B4C5
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id LAA22618;
	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:01:03 +0900 (JST)
To: "Joe.Eggleston" <Joe_Eggleston-CJE136@email.mot.com>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Joe_Eggleston-CJE136's message of Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:03:42 CST.
      <3A1AFF4E.D1FBD5F5@labs.mot.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: IPv6
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:01:03 +0900
Message-ID: <22616.974858463@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>I'm currently trying to decide what open source OS to use for some IPv6
>development. If anyone on this list has used both FreeBSD and Linux for
>IPv6, could you let me know what your sense is about how the IPv6
>implementations compare (as far as stability, ease of setup, complete
>functionality...).

	http://www.tahi.org/ has conformance test results, so the webpage
	can be some reference for functionality POV.

	http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/COVERAGE
	has some idea about functionality comparison between *BSD systems.

>Also, does anyone know of a Mobile IPv6 implementation for FreeBSD?

	the latest kame kit from http://www.kame.net/ has mobile-ip6 code,
	though it may need some torture-tests.
	(it is not in freebsd as it is not tested enough yet)

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message