From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 09:17:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD6F16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from web60804.mail.yahoo.com (web60804.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4AA843D49 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:17:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richard_bejtlich@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040109171717.33976.qmail@web60804.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.84.6.72] by web60804.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:17:16 PST Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:17:16 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Bejtlich To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Paper on device polling and packet capture performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:17:40 -0000 Hello, I was wondering if anyone read the paper by Luca Deri (of Ntop fame) on "Improving Passive Packet Capture: Beyond Device Polling": http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf Luca makes some astounding claims regarding packet capture performance, with FreeBSD performing very well when device polling is enabled. A wrote a short and probably naive synopsis for my Blog: http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_taosecurity_archive.html#107358025105922521 Does anyone care to comment on the paper? (I asked Luca and he agreed to this post.) Thank you, Richard Bejtlich http://www.taosecurity.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus