From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Mar 11  8:13: 2 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4BEC037B400; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2BGCki15965;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:12:46 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@village.org)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2BGCjL23631;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:12:45 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@village.org)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:12:40 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20020311.091240.73661063.imp@village.org>
To: rizzo@icir.org
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, ru@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: can someone explain this change to bsd.lib.mk ?
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020309004315.C16568@iguana.icir.org>
References: <20020308111346.A12303@iguana.icir.org>
	<200203081926.g28JQGL04419@harmony.village.org>
	<20020309004315.C16568@iguana.icir.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message: <20020309004315.C16568@iguana.icir.org>
            Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> writes:
: On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:16PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message <20020308111346.A12303@iguana.icir.org> Luigi Rizzo writes:
: > : The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
: > ...
: > : I wonder, how does a "make world" get around this problem
: > : (so i can try to reproduce the 'fix' in the picobsd script) ?
: > 
: > Make world gets around this problem by doing things in stages so that
: > the build tools are built first using the host environment, then the
: > target binaries are built using the host tools.
:                                       ^^^^
: you mean the newly built tools, right ?

Yes.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message