From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 30 13:03:16 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 559E916A4CE; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6E65F43FF5; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:03:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9UL38E7047391;
	Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:03:08 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:03:05 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20031030.140305.24902655.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: scottl@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031030122318.J11750@pooker.samsco.home>
References: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
	<20031030.120158.98361878.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20031030122318.J11750@pooker.samsco.home>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile
 acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:03:16 -0000

In message: <20031030122318.J11750@pooker.samsco.home>
            Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
: >             Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
: > : On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : > In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
: > : >             M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: > : > : The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
: > : > : decision for SMPng made a long time ago.  That's why there's no longer
: > : > : a SMP kernel option.
: > : >
: > : > Actually, I'm smoking crack here.  Forget I said it.
: > : >
: > : > We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels.  Instead,
: > : > modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.
: > :
: > : Whatever you smoke, the bounty is now up to $40, thanks to another donor.
: > : Let's see some code!
: >
: > I'll clean up what I have and commit it.
: >
: > Warner
: >
: >
: 
: Please, if you're going to do this, do it 100%.  Peter had some
: interesting ideas with unifying the building process of the kernel
: and modules and making the two basically indistinguishable.  This
: would likely get rid of the #ifdef KLD_MODULE hacks running around
: too.

No.  I'm not going to do that.  Like I said, you can have easy, or you
can have complete.  I'm offering to do easy as a first step to
complete, but if you insist on complete, it ain't gonna happen.  We're
back to the same problem we had before.

Warner