From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Aug  2 18:20:11 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975C515080
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  2 Aug 1999 18:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id SAA95445;
	Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199908030120.SAA95445@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: hoek@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:bin/9281
Reply-To: hoek@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/9281; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: hoek@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, murduth@ludd.luth.se
Cc:  
Subject: Re:bin/9281
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:16:30 -0400 (EDT)

 >
 >When repporting errors (and problably other places i havn't found/looked for)
 >awk puts out garbage due to non null memory from malloc.
 
 Probable duplicate of gnu/7821 and gnu/12935.
 
 The patch included in this PR is either harmless or correct (probably
 the latter).  For the moment I've declined to apply it since I'd prefer
 to see gawk upgraded in the contrib section and applying the patch would
 create more conflicts when the upgrade occurs.  However, if nobody
 upgrades gawk within a reasonable time period, the patch should be applied
 to see what it fixes.
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message