From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 19:18:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B60816A41F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:18:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (gate.funkthat.com [69.17.45.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7129343D49 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAOJIBl9071895; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:18:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jAOJIAqH071894; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:18:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:18:10 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: "Ricardo A. Reis" Message-ID: <20051124191810.GE885@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Ricardo A. Reis" , net@freebsd.org References: <4385EA35.9080705@yahoo.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4385EA35.9080705@yahoo.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in routing tables ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:18:13 -0000 Ricardo A. Reis wrote this message on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 14:28 -0200: > I insert this route in my workstation for network test, > > #route add -net 200.144.xx.xx 255.255.254.0 172.22.x.x > > > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 200.144.xx.xxx UGS 1 13407 rl0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 46 lo0 > 136.16&0xac160181 255.255.254.0 UGS 0 34 rl0 > ?????????????????????????? > > > The question is ........................ this is a network bug? Hmm... why is your gateway 255.255.254.0?? It looks like you didn't use the correct options on your route line to specify -netmask and other things... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."