Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:37:29 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: "coder.tuxfamily" <coder@tuxfamily.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT) Message-ID: <4FC37189.6050304@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC330CA.80200@tuxfamily.org> References: <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org> <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de> <4FC1D51C.6000404@gwdg.de> <4FC3225A.2060306@tuxfamily.org> <4FC330CA.80200@tuxfamily.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.05.2012 10:01 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
> Le 28.05.2012 08:59, coder.tuxfamily a écrit :
>> Le 27.05.2012 09:17, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
>>> On 26.05.2012 18:41 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>>> On 26.05.2012 17:49 (UTC+2), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>>>>> Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
>>>>>> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>>>>>>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have the same problem with swig for php...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes
>>>>>> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the
>>>>>> ports:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least
>>>>>> libkml?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an
>>>>>> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos,
>>>>>> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Affected ports can be found for example with
>>>>>> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13"
>>>>>> {} \;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most
>>>>>> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig
>>>>>> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig
>>>>>> ports
>>>>>> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which
>>>>>> should be changed, of course).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses
>>>>> swig-1.3.40.
>>>>> I will try without specify version of swig.
>>>>
>>>> I saw in the news on http://www.swig.org/, that swig 2.0.6 is out with
>>>> many bug fixes and enhancements for templates and target languages like
>>>> php and python. Perhaps swig 2.0.6 is ready now for gdal?
>>>
>>> I made a patch to update from swig 2.0.4 to 2.0.6. Could you please try
>>> if at least some of the observed problems will disappear?
>>>
>>> If this helps we should create a PR and ask the maintainer for an
>>> update.
>>>
>>>> I just checked, that swig 1.3.40 and 2.0.4 should be able to coexist at
>>>> the same time. At least they do not share any filenames.
>>>
>>
>> The patch works but don't solve gdal problems. I think i've found were
>> it's wrong.
>>
>> For Ruby/Swig :
>> See the page on GDAL : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GdalOgrInRuby
>> SWIG 2 is required to build the Ruby bindings against Ruby 1.9.2. (SWIG
>> 1.3.40 is fine for Ruby 1.8.7)
>>
>> When i try to compile, i've two errors :
>>
>> "ogr_wrap.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be
>> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
>> ogr_wrap.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be
>> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC"
>>
>
> For MDB driver (and for java port) it's needed some java stuff, but i
> don't use java and so don't understand what to do
> (http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GdalOgrInJavaBuildInstructionsUnix)
While gdal-1.9.1 with option 'MDB' enabled compiles fine, I have another
failure with option 'Ruby bindings' enabled (both build with swig-2.0.6):
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.1/apps'
(cd swig; gmake build)
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.1/swig'
for dir in ruby ; do (cd $dir; gmake build) || exit; done
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.1/swig/ruby'
swig -Wall -I../include -I../include/ruby -I../include/ruby/docs
-autorename -prefix "gdal::" -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.1
-c++ -ruby -o gdal_wrap.cpp ../include/gdal.i
swig: not found
gmake[2]: *** [gdal_wrap.cpp] Fehler 127
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.1/swig/ruby'
gmake[1]: *** [build] Fehler 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.1/swig'
gmake: *** [swig-modules] Fehler 2
*** [do-build] Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC37189.6050304>