From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Tue May 23 23:10:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9BD78F2C for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E171631 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D5428D78F2A; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4871D78F29 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C45C71630 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4NNAch1009153 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218659] devel/glib20 not fully PREFIX-safe Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 23:10:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218659 --- Comment #9 from Bryan Drewery --- (In reply to John Hein from comment #8) > Thanks. I wasn't aware of the RESETPREFIX usage before this. Maybe that > should be documented - I don't think I would have known what its intended > use was from just the name, although my PLISTPREFIX isn't really any bett= er > in that regard. Is it's sole purpose in life to avoid having plist %D > replacements? Sorry I didn't see your PR before committing. RESETPREFIX is some kind of a hack for where %D doesn't work. In this case %D didn't work; it hit some bug in check-plist. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=