From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 2 01:55:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA10707 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 01:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from diablo.ppp.de (diablo.ppp.de [193.141.101.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA10692 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 01:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from allegro.lemis.de by diablo.ppp.de with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0uQ8wH-000QdTC; Sun, 2 Jun 96 10:55 MET DST From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Organisation: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, 36325 Feldatal, Germany Phone: +49-6637-919123 Fax: +49-6637-919122 Received: (grog@localhost) by allegro.lemis.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA15765; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 10:42:09 +0200 Message-Id: <199606020842.KAA15765@allegro.lemis.de> Subject: Re: Indentation styles To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 10:42:09 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Chat) In-Reply-To: <199605301946.VAA22788@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at May 30, 96 09:46:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J Wunsch writes: > > The typografical rules say ~ 60 chars per line, everything else has to > be made two-column (a bit impractical for programs :). I've been thinking about this for a while, and I both agree and disagree. Yes, more than 60 chars per line become difficult to read, but I *do* use dual columns in my programs. There are these things called comments which I align in a column at the right (starting at column 50 by default). I don't like it when too many code lines run into the comment columns. > Of course, if you've already got 50 columns indentation, then it > would require a 110 chars wide display. So it's rather a question > of not nesting too deep. Well, I have a 110 char display--no problem with that. But I still only have about 50 to play with, including indent, for the code. > I know that stylistic issues are always religious -- but we are on > -chat here. ;) Why not talk religion from time to time? Greg