From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 20 09:12:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE55106566C; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (svn.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB008FC12; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2K9C1PQ091836; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:01 GMT (envelope-from vanhu@svn.freebsd.org) Received: (from vanhu@localhost) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2K9C1g3091835; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:01 GMT (envelope-from vanhu@svn.freebsd.org) Message-Id: <200903200912.n2K9C1g3091835@svn.freebsd.org> From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:01 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-SVN-Group: head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: svn commit: r190138 - head/sys/netipsec X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:02 -0000 Author: vanhu Date: Fri Mar 20 09:12:01 2009 New Revision: 190138 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/190138 Log: Spelling fix in a comment Approved by: gnn(mentor) Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c ============================================================================== --- head/sys/netipsec/key.c Fri Mar 20 09:02:40 2009 (r190137) +++ head/sys/netipsec/key.c Fri Mar 20 09:12:01 2009 (r190138) @@ -4164,7 +4164,7 @@ key_flush_sad(time_t now) /* * Actually, only send expire message if SA has been used, as it * was done before, but should we always send such message, and let IKE - * daemon decide if it should be renegociated or not ? + * daemon decide if it should be renegotiated or not ? * XXX expire message will actually NOT be sent if SA is only used * after soft lifetime has been reached, see below (DYING state) */