Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:10:42 +0900 From: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What we keep under /etc Message-ID: <20041011151042S.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041011001449.GB9460@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0410091546140.2113@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20041010011818G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20041011001449.GB9460@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
obrien> I dare say the majority would be happy with 'make obrien> installworld' updating /etc. And that not doing so should be obrien> the exception. I dunno what is the 'major' or not (that's not in my interests), but it seems that there are (hard to easily neglect) number of users, who against to force-updating /etc by "make installworld." -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041011151042S.matusita>