From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 20 06:00:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490FF106566B for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA1F8FC0A for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1K607FA069545 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:00:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1K607DD069544; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:00:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:00:07 GMT Message-Id: <201002200600.o1K607DD069544@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Rob Farmer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/144059: shells/scponly: setup_chroot.sh patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rob Farmer List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:00:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/144059; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rob Farmer To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/144059: shells/scponly: setup_chroot.sh patch Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:56:58 -0800 How about changing the note saying to run /usr/local/share/examples/scponly/setup_chroot.sh? Something like: To setup chroot cage, run following commands: 1) cd ${EXAMPLESDIR}/ && ${SH} setup_chroot.sh 2) Set scponlyc_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf 3) Run ${LOCALBASE}/etc/rc.d/scponlyc start I think that would make it more clear what to do and eliminate any confusion. I'm not really a fan of deleting the rc.d script because I think it is more correct to mount a devfs than to just touch an empty /dev/null file. -- Rob Farmer