From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 10 18:56:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4B9B0C for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:6a29:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436533B9 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: Problem building world (amd64) this morning From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <20150410181818.GL1394@zxy.spb.ru> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:55:55 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20FD13EA-9A24-41B8-A0A3-19F5EDC8FB4E@odo.in-berlin.de> References: <5527D3FC.3000003@wintek.com> <20150410145529.GH15644@albert.catwhisker.org> <9B3B9CA5-2B7E-407E-98EA-285F86D30BEF@cs.huji.ac.il> <20150410181818.GL1394@zxy.spb.ru> To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at mail.mer-waases.invalid X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:56:06 -0000 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 07:49:38PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> I'am seeing this too. Same error messages. >> >> Latest revision failing is: >> >> | Relative URL: ^/stable/10 >> | Revision: 281372 >> >> Latest revision compiling without any issue is: >> >> | Relative URL: ^/stable/10 >> | Revision: 281265 >> >> /etc/src.conf and /etc/make.conf are empty. > > Look like r281289 is cause. I can confirm that. r281288 compiles without failing, r281289 fails. Regards, Michael