Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:08:48 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for PRs: nullfs Message-ID: <40F835D0.8070609@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407160008280.20163-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407160008280.20163-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: >Although there has been much discussion of the bugginess of nullfs >on the mailing lists in the past, there are actually only a few PRs >about it. Perhaps it's time to figure out what errors still exist >as we contemplate 5-STABLE. > >I have taken the liberty of going through the PR database to ensure >that any PR involving the operation of nullfs or mount_null (other >than simply referring to them in documentation, etc.) have the 'nullfs' >string in the Synopsis. From my count, these are the following: > > kern/28206 (5.0-CURRENT) > kern/28566 (4.3) > kern/51583 (confirmed still a problem in -STABLE, -CURRENT) > kern/59945 (4.9) > bin/59569 (5.1) > kern/63662 (fixed in -CURRENT, not yet backported) > >If anyone has others with either 4.10, -STABLE, or -CURRENT, I would >like to ask that they submit them (with the 'nullfs' keyword in the >Synopsis) so that we can figure out where we are. > >Thanks. > >mcl > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I'm using nullfs for jails on -4.8(ish) without problems so far.. I'm only using a subset of functionality.. e.g.. files looked at in the jail are never looked at by another jail or by the base system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40F835D0.8070609>