From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:36:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58781065670 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5678FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KPMtp-0007X7-Hu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:36:21 -0700 Message-ID: <18792525.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:36:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl Subject: Using CPUTYPE=core2, Penryn instructions support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:36:22 -0000 Hello. >From what I understand, gcc42 does not support core2 option. How it's possible that some people are using it with FreeBSD -CURRENT (and it's not used as mere prescott alias). http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html Is -CURRENT using newer version of gcc, despite licensing problems? I'm interested in using full Penryn instructions, if that would be possible... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-CPUTYPE%3Dcore2%2C-Penryn-instructions-support-tp18792525p18792525.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.