From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 26 08:52:33 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE5A37B404
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7936743FBF
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:52:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wes@softweyr.com)
Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (66-91-236-204.san.rr.com
	[66.91.236.204])	by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E824F431BF; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:52:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Organization: Softweyr
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, arch@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:52:25 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <5238.1048510775@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <5238.1048510775@critter.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303260852.25978.wes@softweyr.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.1 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT
	autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
Subject: Re: moving GEOM around...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:52:34 -0000

On Monday 24 March 2003 04:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> A number of people have suggested that the directory layout of GEOM
> sources should be changed.  The main complaint seems to be that
> sys/geom contains both subdirectories (bde) and source files.
>
> I personally don't particularly care about that, and as a matter
> of fact wasn't even aware that was a rule, but if a significant
> number of people think this is wrong I'm willing to repo-copy things
> around and fix it, therefore this strawpoll:
>
> Option 1:  No change

I'll take door number 1, Mr. Kamp.

-- 

        Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters                                               wes@softweyr.com