From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Apr 18 7:13:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B052037BAA8 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:13:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14004 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:13:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA01252 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:13:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dustdevil.waterspout.com (fourier.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933AA37B61C for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:13:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from csg@dustdevil.waterspout.com) Received: (from csg@localhost) by dustdevil.waterspout.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA02196; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:20:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from csg) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:20:44 -0500 From: "C. Stephen Gunn" To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Outdated rdist in FreeBSD Base Message-ID: <20000418092044.A2172@waterspout.com> References: <200004180408.XAA00886@dustdevil.waterspout.com> <200004180737.BAA89618@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200004180737.BAA89618@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 01:37:34AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 01:37:34AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > Agreed. And I think there are still some security concerns with > rdist. Can you provide us with some specifics? While I think it should be removed from the base, I still use rdist v6 every day for software distribution. :-) - Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message