From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 28 03:50:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88527106566C; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: from what-creek.com (what-creek.com [66.111.37.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581588FC17; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: by what-creek.com (Postfix, from userid 102) id 5766E73301; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:50:05 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:50:05 +0000 From: John Birrell To: Ben Kaduk Message-ID: <20080328035005.GA34149@what-creek.com> References: <200803272321.m2RNLQGT083530@repoman.freebsd.org> <47d0403c0803272008u127e61f0u1296d99e6f9d220c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0803272008u127e61f0u1296d99e6f9d220c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, John Birrell , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/cddl Makefile.inc src/cddl/lib/libavl Makefile src/cddl/lib/libnvpair Makefile src/cddl/lib/libumem Makefile src/cddl/lib/libuutil Makefile src/cddl/lib/libzfs Makefile src/cddl/lib/libzpool Makefile src/cddl/sbin/zfs Makefile ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:50:06 -0000 On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:08:37PM -0400, Ben Kaduk wrote: > On 3/27/08, John Birrell wrote: > > jb 2008-03-27 23:21:25 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > Log: > > The sources covered by Sun's CDDL have been repo copied below the > > src/cddl and src/sys/cddl directories per the core@ decision following > > the license review. > > > > This change modifies the affected Makefiles to reference the sources > > in their new location. > > I somehow got the impression that it was traditional to make a forced > commit to the files that were repo-copied, to note in their histories > when that transition took place. > > Did I get this impression in error? No, you are right. I forgot about that. Will do it. -- John Birrell