From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 27 13:58:41 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0714916A41C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 27 May 2005 13:58:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A718143D4C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 27 May 2005 13:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1593710wri
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 27 May 2005 06:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=fW7zrBJNGXePDUjPnG5fr/bnsQsVEwP2CQAlbUtTPcsr3hbxSAqqFxlLpkRftmGXC1TDpMo4+jca0XbF13UPecBowvZ792pTu1A78YwmLii/V2XE4npKPdc51jfk6cLxlfmxGRo4MJbDqWrDclhlkaG7YQujE7y+d4GZozMaPrM=
Received: by 10.54.8.41 with SMTP id 41mr2549510wrh;
	Fri, 27 May 2005 06:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2005 06:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b7052e1e050527065841095e25@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:58:39 +0400
From: Dmitry Mityugov <dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com>
To: Jacob S <stormspotter@6texans.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050527085445.38de5553@jacob.6texans.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050527085445.38de5553@jacob.6texans.net>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov <dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:58:41 -0000

On 5/27/05, Jacob S  wrote:
> Hello list,
>=20
> I upgraded a few 5.3 servers to 5.4 yesterday and everything seemed to
> go well. After booting the new kernel, dmesg correctly showed 2 logical
> cpus (1 xeon with HT).
>=20
> However, when I look at top's output, it always shows at least 50% cpu
> idle time - even when the load is above 10. To confirm this, I ran
> burnP6 from the cpuburn port - even with over a hundred apache processes
> going, exim running and a few other things, top still reported the cpu
> as 50% idle. The 'C' column in top, between 'State' and 'Time' also
> shows everything as being run on cpu 0.
>=20
> `ps ax | grep cpu` reports this:
>  11  ??  RL     0:00.00 [idle: cpu1]
>  12  ??  RL   931:45.24 [idle: cpu0]
> 108  ??  DL     0:04.02 [schedcpu]
>=20
> So it looks like smp support is enabled and it sees the HT enabled
> processor, but it's not using the second logical cpu. Is there something
> I missed in compiling the kernel, or is this a bug? I have confirmed it
> on two 5.4 servers now.

Was option smp used to compile the kernel? What other changes to the
kernel configuration file were made?

Dmitry