From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 19 04:48:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA08730 for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (root@grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA08720 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (mark@localhost.grondar.za [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA24381; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 13:45:55 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199606191145.NAA24381@grumble.grondar.za> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch - time to kill ncftp? Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 13:45:55 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > Ya know, the only reason I ever brought ncftp into the source tree was > so that bsd.port.mk could use it, and now that we have `fetch' I'm > wondering if we might not throw a bone to the anti-bloatists and move > ncftp back to the ports collection? YES PLEASE! The one in the tree currently is ancient. It is kinda unprofessional to be distributing code that has in its random tips a valid comment that it is now out-of-date and "please fetch version 2 from blah" ;-) > If there are no major outcries to the contrary, I'll do it in a few > days. Do it. Its easier to get forgivness than permission ]:-> M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key