Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:08:06 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: "Doug Hardie" <bc979@lafn.org> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Use of CVS Message-ID: <fb6605670701111208v779a635bqdfdf20c0969c7b04@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> References: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/11/07, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote: > one for the new development or the other way around. Will it be > easier to merge the fixes to the production branch back in to the new > system later or should those fixes be made to both branches at the > same time? Any suggestions on these approaches will be appreciated. > Thanks, This is really a basic stream management question, not specific to freebsd, or CVS for that matter. Perhaps you should reference one of numerous texts on stream management, and find a development model that is most comfortable for you. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fb6605670701111208v779a635bqdfdf20c0969c7b04>