From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 06:50:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24D716A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:50:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from llp@iteranet.com) Received: from eva.iteranet.ru (eva.iteranet.ru [212.74.231.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD5743D48 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from llp@iteranet.com) Received: from [10.1.41.116] ([10.1.44.45]) by eva.iteranet.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBT6ofA9025431; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:50:41 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from llp@iteranet.com) Message-ID: <43B38747.1060906@iteranet.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:50:47 +0300 From: Alexey Popov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050419) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan References: <20051228143817.GA6898@uk.tiscali.com> <001401c60bc0$a3c87e90$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <20051228153106.GA7041@uk.tiscali.com> <20051228164339.GB3875@zen.inc> In-Reply-To: <20051228164339.GB3875@zen.inc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (eva.iteranet.ru [212.74.231.163]); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:50:42 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1219/Thu Dec 29 01:57:59 2005 on eva.iteranet.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Brian Candler Subject: Re: IPSEC documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:50:49 -0000 Hi. VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: >>- L2TP + IPSEC transport mode (= Windows road warrier) > Did someone tried such a setup ? > is there a L2TPD daemon running on FreeBSD which could be used for > that ? I'm successfully using security/racoon and net/sl2tps with Windows XP/2003 L2TP clients. I've tried pre-shared key as well as X.509 certificates auth. > Note also that, for now, this won't work easily, as it will require > dynamic SP entries (roadwarriors....), but I think racoon currently > can't deal with dynamic policies when ports specified (I'll check > that). racoon has passive_mode option. When it is enabled, racoon can create SPD entries for road warriors. If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice of VPN concentrator. With best regards, Alexey Popov