From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Jan 22 11:10:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from excalibur.dotcom.fr (ns.dotcom.fr [195.154.74.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D985D37B404; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 11:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from IPricot.com (pc181.fr.ipricot.com [192.168.31.181])
	by excalibur.dotcom.fr (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA20646;
	Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:10:28 GMT
Message-ID: <3A6C85A3.9A115BB4@IPricot.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:10:27 +0100
From: Roman Le Houelleur <roman@IPricot.com>
Organization: dotcom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1-20000912-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bandwidth analyser
References: <200101221855.f0MItLq39152@iguana.aciri.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> 
> 
> >  Moreover, concerning the bridge, I was wondering if
> > there is a way not to put a third interface in promiscous
> 
> yes, there is asysctl interface (net.link.ether.bridge_cfg)
> 
> see the manpages.

 actually that's what I did, but I'm still not able to have
my third nic out of the bridge.
 If I use net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: rl0:0,rl1:1,rl2:1
rl0 is on a separate cluster, so it's useable, but still
rl0 is in promiscous mode.
 If I use something like net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: rl1:1,rl2:1
then rl0 will by default be part of the same "cluster" as 
rl1 and rl2.

 Have I missed something ?

Roman.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message