Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:10:27 +0100
From:      Roman Le Houelleur <roman@IPricot.com>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bandwidth analyser
Message-ID:  <3A6C85A3.9A115BB4@IPricot.com>
References:  <200101221855.f0MItLq39152@iguana.aciri.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> 
> 
> >  Moreover, concerning the bridge, I was wondering if
> > there is a way not to put a third interface in promiscous
> 
> yes, there is asysctl interface (net.link.ether.bridge_cfg)
> 
> see the manpages.

 actually that's what I did, but I'm still not able to have
my third nic out of the bridge.
 If I use net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: rl0:0,rl1:1,rl2:1
rl0 is on a separate cluster, so it's useable, but still
rl0 is in promiscous mode.
 If I use something like net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: rl1:1,rl2:1
then rl0 will by default be part of the same "cluster" as 
rl1 and rl2.

 Have I missed something ?

Roman.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A6C85A3.9A115BB4>