From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 08:19:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4004016A418 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B85913C455 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Dec 2007 08:19:51 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp039) with SMTP; 01 Dec 2007 09:19:51 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/eubdlcpTeaZ7m9Al0XZi2jPCiry9bDQ2JCXM5ac SM5szgsJ8lg1jv Message-ID: <47511925.8080706@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:19:49 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <474EBC23.3000901@gmx.de> <474F1E27.20906@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <474F1E27.20906@gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Freminlins Subject: Re: 7.0 installation, and Xorg in particular X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 08:19:53 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > Freminlins wrote: > > >> Err, yeah. Look through hundreds of packages to see which dependencies >> they >> have. Helpful. Not. >> >> This way of doing X11 is seriously unhelpful to end users. If having >> individual packages for everything is so good, please tell me why >> everything >> in /bin, /usr/bin and so on is not an individual package. It's because >> the >> idea of doing so is dumb. >> >> Frem. >> > Allthough I think the modular approach to Xorg is a good thing, I have > to agree the xorg-meta port installs A LOT of ports. A xorg-lite port an > xorg-lite port would be usefull for a user who is planning on installing > a low-end X windows environment. I thought I read at the > freebsd-ports list such thing was being worked on some time ago. But I > haven't heard anything about it anymore for quite some time now. What > happened to that idea ? I suppose because it's not needed: # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg # make config-recursive will allow you to make all your choices.