From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 07:03:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFAC16A418; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0523913C442; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B832709A; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 03:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:03:10 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: Mn2xEmUFBIqfvmd9hCuOt3ia+DolkxKGFOeX3OUq4c4F 1189062189 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8457115B7; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 03:03:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46DFA62C.3070700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:03:08 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070630) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein References: <20070905221150.GY87451@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20070905221150.GY87451@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (forw) Re: Allocating AF constants for vendors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:03:24 -0000 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Bruce, I haven't heard back from you on this. can you please comment? > > I'd like to add the policy to the header. > I'm not 100% happy with this suggestion, however, it is a loosely working compromise. I would be happier if the static index dependency on AF_MAX is ironed out at some later date. regards, BMS