From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 13 06:42:07 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947A5F67
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yerenkow@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com (mail-pb0-f51.google.com
 [209.85.160.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA8F68A
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id un15so690741pbc.38
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=3kysHcGWy9w0e8TbB+OYtHeKifBPu1iskQ3eR6a1tYc=;
 b=MDzyWSNJ7rvDGMHhxE0ubKXK+jAEocRp4B3fewgw24OWeFexZ1mENSWkV2z553EpJY
 3p2i826stHjrrwKQRoy+a2OX8ZZeYwaE3uAZyC4ulWkfAvxpJIKPjxTKATi1sXdCt8Gk
 avgg49zLW2b3Hqos0wHpXfsBk1by2wZ+IveqwTDQFq7ybAJAYYW0DNk4Z4G01YZJ9+up
 S1sXRWAuEE3OjXCTrUJsehVwd6WBF/RQmLHvQO1yCxv+HwjKqWiq7EHrFF9l/JInv8mU
 cwnYTdmSZ1inLjNRiA5O/yATjsV/2B7lfcImC7ZM8wukko1XqFrCjchWsuzCq3UTQQXk
 m/2Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.137.131 with SMTP id qi3mr43348289pbb.47.1363156926577;
 Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.36.69 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com>
References: <web-11636850@mailback4.g2host.com> <513E2DA5.70200@mac.com>
 <web-12282796@mailback4.g2host.com>
 <op.wts7cnaeg7njmm@michael-think>
 <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:42:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPJF9wnQCn=thNmZ5jhObjf4usCaQfdrYcTk6Tfd5v31_88bmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn - but smaller?
From: Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com>
To: John Mehr <jcm@visi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: Michael Ross <gmx@ross.cx>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:42:07 -0000

I think that this keys shouldn't be included into binary.

svnup --ports
svnup --stable
svnup --security (or --release)


I'm proposing create somewhere, like in
/usr/share/svnup/aliases
with

ports<TAB>svn://svn.freebsd.org/blabla/....
stable<TAB>svn://svn.freebsd.org/blabla/ {uname-arch}/{uname-version}/ ....
etc.

So we will have some freedom to enhance and tweak it's behhavior while at
least in alpha stage.


-- 
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow