Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:58:40 +0000
From:      Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Lars Eighner <portsuser@larseighner.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Libslang Libslang2
Message-ID:  <20080313135839.GA57673@charon.picobyte.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080313070241.R11434@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>
References:  <20080313070241.R11434@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:04:01AM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
> libslang and libslang2 both say in their makefiles that they conflict with
> one another.  Is this really so?

If they install files in the same place, they can't co-exist peacefully.

> can slrn be made to work with libslang2?

Looks like S-Lang 2 support was added to the current developer release.
Since that's been out for ~3 years now, I guess it can be considered
stable. I'll update the port.

Shaun

-- 
Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin
of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080313135839.GA57673>