From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jul 24 8: 2:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDB337B405 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F393443E72 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:02:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.int (mail@pooh.int [10.0.1.2]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6OF2eW9077684 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:02:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kirk by pooh.int with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17XNey-0002fG-00 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:02:40 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do i stop fsck from autochecking? References: <013701c232a9$d7705400$0801a8c0@customfilmeffects.com> <87sn29kf6n.fsf@pooh.int> <01ce01c232bf$73f16f20$0801a8c0@customfilmeffects.com> From: Kirk Strauser Date: 24 Jul 2002 10:02:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <01ce01c232bf$73f16f20$0801a8c0@customfilmeffects.com> Message-ID: <8765z5jhin.fsf@pooh.int> Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2002-07-24T03:08:58Z, "David Smithson" writes: > I'm not completely green. The reason I wanted to stop fsck in the first > place was so I could edit /etc/fstab, comment out the mount entry for that > particular array, finish the init sequence which includes another very > critical array, and run fsck manually on the dirty array. OK, that's reasonable. I (and the other posters) were hoping to save you trouble down the road, but your usage makes sense. > I understand that the CURRENT tree is separate from the STABLE tree. I > did not mean to misrepresent my intentions. I wasn't doubting that you knew that -CURRENT and -STABLE are seperate. I just wanted you be be perfectly clear that one is *not* an upgrade of the other in any way. You *may* get newer versions of a few tools, but you *will* get broken versions of others. -- Kirk Strauser The Strauser Group - http://www.strausergroup.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message