From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 22:05:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CE416A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5270B43D2F for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richw@richw.org) Received: from whodunit.richw.org (SW-90-716-276-1.Stanford.EDU [171.66.155.243]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0PM5jX6020563 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:05:45 -0800 Received: from whodunit.richw.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whodunit.richw.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0PM5iSn036419; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:05:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richw@whodunit.richw.org) Received: (from richw@localhost) by whodunit.richw.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0PM5iS3036418; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:05:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richw) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:05:44 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Wales To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050125215609.C30917.richw@whodunit.richw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: NIC acting promiscuously -- how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:46 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: > To verify what your interface is accepting use: tcpdump -pei rl0 > That will show the packets that it accepts including the ethernet > headers. Those headers should all have your MAC address in them > (send or receive). Very good suggestion. Thanks. After running the above command for a while, and examining the output, it turns out that the large amount of traffic on my external net is mostly ARP "who-has" requests (sent to the broadcast MAC address). These are, of course, legitimate. There is also a relatively small number of multicast packets -- most of which are MDNS (multicast DNS). So, I was mistaken; my NIC doesn't have a "promiscuity" problem after all. Sorry for raising a needless alarm. Rich Wales richw@richw.org http://www.richw.org