From nobody Sat Sep 23 12:00:43 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rt74q5CCTz4tXhq for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rt74q2vmRz3NYC for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1695470443; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HkvGzgjAkxyIaRhSLxUVEkzrHpk4NYmmHj39L/kBE/XGEIbKuYKphmg0veV6FzB9LnFrHp V3u/gcxHtUZx2r6pVlEMBTVRvkXoS0zjnWnrwF6xGQop61SEQJ1bthoDFIxgk6wv0dPhdw 7GIyxusGLr7pRzVNzPnmAdgZUua/S9xWvGZB4aLRbLEb0LasSK6qTvfmjRENsnVT/CE7Wn Zb0FD9rw/V3edzG+ogdvrOAny/wmD2qsSyZsphTv0qy9Tk+A/nN2idIxOkesbC7Iovq2yU 8DMP2DCHQeVYcxRxV68lZRiliY2e4DYoIFINrj/bOtY6uK8J4GetNFx2cs/tPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1695470443; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/ScflBNsr2++6InmEjxlY7tdwt6u+dTZeJNfTkkJNco=; b=GrKI6OAYN56L1pbpKwzogH1+vfa5uicw4/q8KwnY7jSXFOqj/y6W0TJN+Vjn57QYSvncH2 AtvRhL5FKZGst+sGr5SudC/oqSkmL9QXrSXGXU2OvEsdpMfZQCn854u/4KiUYtYHsa6sF/ GR3nR9406dW6gUPrq941Wr5Sa+3jUhbWW27mb7oPd+aMMkWP6KRfCHjszzHP9CHWdB8pj+ PMfeLoICWVA8LfPq5ewPnHCDbeOEGTSpoiW6qimoYbj/AzW5SapfKoc8dJs1yBC8Lq//wa 7E8hNJ6YkoPxscpY45X41JX7+NVxC4uR9BYHUdwbC9izYe8xC49Z+gtkTE3Itg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rt74q1yzxz131d for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 38NC0hsp091564 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:00:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 38NC0hKv091563 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:00:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 274028] ng_bridge fails to learn MAC addresses if link is in different VNET Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:00:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dpslavov@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274028 --- Comment #3 from Dancho Penev --- Hi Marko, Thank you for your swift response. When I was thinking how to fix my problem I also considered your solution b= ut went with more limited change instead of global one because: a) I'm not expert here and it's silly to make broad changes in such situati= on b) I would create hidden security catch: when someone moves interface into = new VNET he/she expects outbound packets to be processed in this new VNET, inst= ead behind the scene the VNET is replaced That's why I thought that it's better to leave the global solution to more knowledgeable person, which definitely you are. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=