From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 22:51:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBA716A419 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6AA13C448 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id C6C841A4D7E; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:50:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:50:14 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20071212225014.GY61429@elvis.mu.org> References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:51:03 -0000 try using "instance". "Oh I'm going to use the FOO routing instance." Works nicely. * Julian Elischer [071212 14:34] wrote: > So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support.. > the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited > functionality. > It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs (I > hope). > Later there will be a more flexible version for-current. > > Here's the question.. > > I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on.. > e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set xxx to > 1 > (0 based).. > > > current;y in my code I'm using 'universe' but I don't like that.. > > one could think of it as a routing plane.. > each routing plane has he same interfaces on it but they are logically > treated differently becasue each plane has a different routing table. > > > so here's an axample of it in use now... > the names should change... > > setuniverse 1 netstat -rn > [shows table 1] > setuniverse 2 route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.2.1 > setuinverse 1 route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.3.1 > setuniverse 2 route -n get 10.0.0.3 > [shows 192.168.2.1] > setuniverse 1 route -n get 10.0.0.3 > [shows 192.168.3.1] > setuniverse 2 start_apache > [appache starts, always using 192.168.2.1 to reach the 10.0.0 net. > > > also the syscall is setuniverse() > > so, you see I really need a better name.... > setrtab? > > rtab? rtbl? > > and the command should be called "????" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- - Alfred Perlstein