From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 16:16:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02FD2603 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD94F392 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8NGGnoI040795 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:16:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193649] ring->nr_buf_size will be calculated wrongly on PPC machine Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:16:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: thomasyang1206@126.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:16:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193649 --- Comment #1 from dongshan --- the bug is caused as following: imaging a 32-bit integer 0x00000800, on little endian machine, the data in memory is arranged like this: [0000 0000] 0000 [0000 0001] 0000 [0000 0002] 1000 [0000 0003] 0000 [0000 0004] 0000 [0000 0005] 0000 [0000 0006] 0000 [0000 0007] 0000 However, on a big endian machine, the value in memory is: [0000 0000] 0000 [0000 0001] 0000 [0000 0002] 0000 [0000 0003] 0000 [0000 0004] 0000 [0000 0005] 1000 [0000 0006] 0000 [0000 0007] 0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the trick: uint32_t foo; // let assume the address of foo is 0x0, as showed above. uint32_t *p = &foo; *(uint16_t *)p = 0x00000800; printf("foo: 0x%x", foo); // the output of foo will be 0x08000000 printf("foo1:0x%x", (uint16_t)foo); // the output will be 0x00000800 Dump the memory on big endian machine: [0000 0000] 0000 [0000 0001] 1000 [0000 0002] 0000 [0000 0003] 0000 [0000 0004] 0000 [0000 0005] 0000 [0000 0006] 0000 [0000 0007] 0000 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.