From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 13 05:25:37 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3070A16A46D
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:25:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu)
Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu
	[140.142.32.178])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5F13C447
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:25:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu)
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be
	forged))
	by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP
	id l5D5Pafe012808
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:25:36 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
	[24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10)
	by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id
	l5D5PZWG024028
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:25:36 -0700
Message-ID: <466F7FD1.2020303@u.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:25:37 -0700
From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604,
	Antispam-Data: 2007.6.12.220855
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0,
	__CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0,
	__MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Subject: Reason for doing malloc / bzero over calloc?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:25:37 -0000

    Title says it all -- is there a particular reason why malloc/bzero 
should be used instead of calloc?
-Garrett