Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:30:37 +0200
From:      Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua>
To:        PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090
Message-ID:  <20120313123037.0eb29eb9.ray@dlink.ua>
In-Reply-To: <CAFZ_MYJsNF-XMp_61udyLhn0y-_-bM22izHFLnNE1vkuAnyz1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAFZ_MYJsNF-XMp_61udyLhn0y-_-bM22izHFLnNE1vkuAnyz1Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:06 -0600
PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote:

>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 12
>> > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:14:23 -0700
>> > From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
>> > Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for
>> > rt2860/rt3090 To: "Sevan / Venture37" <venture37@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
>> > Message-ID:
>> >        <CAJ-Vmo=jJmwY=bTVaKFYTd--1E9vzwgn54VMJyY82bc9pSWcBg@mail.gmail.com>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> >
>> > On 11 March 2012 14:10, Sevan / Venture37 <venture37@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>> I'll post a new one in a bit. If you want to help, would you be
>> >>> ok with git as opposed to hg?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> nope not at all but if its because of familiarity then in this
>> >> scenario it doesn't make much difference which is used, same work
>> >> flow, change, commit, push, pull, rinse, repeat. :)
>> >
>> > Hiya,
>> >
>> > Let's just strip the ^M's from the tree and as long as ray@ and
>> > pseudocyclon are a-ok with the work thus far, I'll commit it to
>> > -HEAD.
>> >
>> > We can then tidy things up from there.
>> >
>> > I just don't want to commit ^M's to the tree, or blatant style(9)
>> > violations. But we can always tidy things up incrementally once
>> > they're in the tree.
>> >
>> 
>> I've talked about ieee80211_send_bar() with matt, already.

Can you please point me to that discussion?

>> 
>> Other than that,
>> * rt2860_raw_xmit() ignores ieee80211_bpf_params,

added that under notyet, so we will deal with it in near future

>> * wouldn't that be better to disable some interrupts that only
>> increment counters. i.e rt2860_gp_timer_intr()

good point - removed

>> 
>> Though, we can tidy up all of those later.
>> 
>> 
>> > The driver attaches but ifconfig wlan0 scan doesn't show any access
>> > points
>> 
>> All mgt frames are sent as wme class of 5, but probe_req frames
>> should be sent as WME_AC_BE. This might cause glitch in probing.
>> Hence nothing in scan result. (?)
>> 

IIRC it show scan results w/o problems, but i will look on it later.

>> 
>> AK
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Thank you very much!

WBW
-- 
Alexandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua> 
aka Alex RAY <ray@ddteam.net>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120313123037.0eb29eb9.ray>