From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 14 6:50:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from brisefer.cediti.be (brisefer.cediti.be [193.190.156.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DAA37B408 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:50:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Olivier.Cherrier@cediti.be) Received: by brisefer.cediti.be with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:46:57 +0200 Message-ID: From: Olivier Cherrier To: 'freebsd-questions' Subject: Actual firewall Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:46:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello. I am going to set up a new firewall. Usually, I use the association IPFilter/IPNat. Since the IPF licence changed and since the OpenBSD project completely removed IPF from his source tree, is it possible that a similar thing append to the FreeBSD project? I read the public mails from Darren Reed. He said that FreeBSD and NetBSD can use it and patch it. But, is it possible that things change? Since I naturally prefer build a firewall with a supported tools set, could some hackers say me whether I can reasonably use IPF or whether I have to use IPFW? Thanks a lot for your helpful comments. oc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message