Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:12:27 +1100 (EST) From: Peter Ross <Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de> To: Peter Ross <Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de> Cc: Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it>, David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Comments on the KSE option Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610311010330.3195@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20061030210629.H778@localhost> References: <45425D92.8060205@elischer.org> <200610281132.21466.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20061028105454.S69980@fledge.watson.org> <20061028194125.GL30707@riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu> <20061028204357.A83519@fledge.watson.org> <1162199366.4309.6.camel@massimo.datacode.it> <20061030210629.H778@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just a correction: On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Peter Ross wrote: > I administrate SMP servers running a resource-hungry Java/tomcat app. The > JVM has several hundred threads, e.g. 100 for every DB connection in a > connection pool. It is a connection pool for 100 connections, and the connection pool uses 100 threads for it. Regards Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.64.0610311010330.3195>