From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 08:08:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D0516A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:08:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBB343D49 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:08:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A4C653FF; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:08:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05134-03-4; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:08:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (adsl-66-127-57-108.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [66.127.57.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFD765213; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:08:27 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 925816246; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:08:17 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: "Thomas E. Zander" Message-ID: <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:08:30 -0000 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote: > I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for RELENG_5. > Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it? ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based USB2 disk enclosure. BMS --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: '' iD8DBQFBgfpwueUpAYYNtTsRAkjSAKCc/WSR9ztfA4ykxHELlQYCXo5wxQCePNlU UfFBeQWW4U/+BdCRxJarUKI= =Wc1h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--