From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 29 14:27:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DA61065713; Fri, 29 May 2009 14:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smallpox@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82C08FC22; Fri, 29 May 2009 14:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smallpox@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so3202015yxb.13 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:27:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cB657DlPnxqv9zN3akpqclQlFVrFvzyyWMQTvWp/dGs=; b=gkGNV9ConeA5+MdGMlxjXKJ3N3lCFFmmrNqp4j6iXh/3fJVSEkQAW9LP3tu7qTg4n2 0mhEsp0c3HJqfejP2D+q4TDZG15NPfRB57t2Ck4tlhBC63RSgzdt+cOihbcdeK2Ddvxj 1sFTEB9s6Gf8/5EWXemTym8bNdXzRUgHIM2HY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iIjsQdl98A3wMOGFpGGN4kbhmpZNatRG9qJiBiO5kKyqBaCk1IJmFxjlR62H2W9FIY jebAf264NHfqk7c1QnMI6fWZzvYQLciR3/waY6vACPPm//dK5LgTS/1XiKhd0kdCzCuk iLl/kqRrACZ+Zc3ZixxTHS+1HbV2gw3kXcHTc= Received: by 10.90.84.2 with SMTP id h2mr2151580agb.6.1243607241940; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.2? (24-180-16-19.dhcp.mtpk.ca.charter.com [24.180.16.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm2424528agd.3.2009.05.29.07.27.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 29 May 2009 07:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A1FF0B1.8040209@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:26:57 -0700 From: smallpox User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harti Brandt References: <4A1F2706.2080304@gmail.com> <20090529142757.X22933@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <20090529142757.X22933@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsnmpd + netsnmp & 64bits counters problem, bce interface problems maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:27:23 -0000 well, from what im told by snmp people, it's what's happening at that time, so up and down is normal... but not at the rate that the non-working one is going. and this one's upload and download are spread out normallly, 24 mbit out, 2mbit in... current figures on the messed up system: [07:25:32 5/29] IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /1 sec: 238914024 [07:25:32 5/29] IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /1 sec: 223977573 [07:25:47 5/29] IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /1 sec: 235054494 [07:25:47 5/29] IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /1 sec: 222830449 one of the differences between bsnmpd and net-snmpd is net-snmpd updates every 15 sec, anyway. see how the in/out are so close? that's totally off. the driver in question is bce... im not sure thanks Harti Brandt wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2009, smallpox wrote: > > s>hey guys, i've read > s> > > [SNIP] > > s> > s>in comparison to an intel em.. 32bit, it's linked at a gigabit though.. but no > s>heavy traffic there. > s> > s>--BEGIN WORKING > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 1932426 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 24270520 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2199107 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 28672350 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2049073 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 22716321 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2036279 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 24361972 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2571021 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 32539047 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2416155 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 30571680 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2583795 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 35712392 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2665891 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 34761228 > s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 2249559 > s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 27438273 > s> > s>--END WORKING > > Do I get it wrong or do the 32-bit counters also go up and down? Given > that bsnmpd just retrieves the values from the kernel and sends them over > SNMP without looking at the values (for the 32-bit counters) this looks > rather like a problem in the kernel/driver. Do these drivers perhaps use > multiple threads for receiving? > > harti > >