Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:26:03 +0100 (CET) From: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@NetBSD.org> Cc: hackers@openbsd.org Subject: Re: kqueue, NOTE_EOF Message-ID: <200311130926.hAD9Q3jv024862@s102-n054.tele2.cz> In-Reply-To: <20031112172750.GB14368@netbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Studenmund wrote: > I think the difference is in the default behavior. When you're at EOF, I > know that poll() will give you a read-availability event, so you'll read > the EOF. Will kqueue? AFAIK yes for sockets, not for file descriptor (i.e. descriptor open to a file on filesystem). Would poll() give you read-availability event when on end of file on filesystem. Jaromir -- Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.cz/ -=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the Buddhist -=- -=- masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=- -=- sometimes levitate or glow. Do not let this distract you.'' -=-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311130926.hAD9Q3jv024862>