From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Jul 19 18:22:59 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from snafu.adept.org (adsl-63-201-63-44.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.201.63.44])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8EFEE37B8FC; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mike@adept.org)
Received: by snafu.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EF5B39EE01; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snafu.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E75B99B001; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>
To: Paul Herman <pherman@frenchfries.net>
Cc: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: "ifconfig" == "ifconfig -a"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007191626510.236-100000@bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007191822120.4533-100000@snafu.adept.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Paul Herman wrote:

> Hmmm... what led to this idea was:  people who use "route print" to
> print the routing table in "other" OSes need to be informed how to
> print the routing table under FreeBSD.  If that's really true, some
> how I have a feeling they would already know about "netstat -r" (which
> AFAIK is pretty much ubiquitous among Unicies.)
> 
> Is it just me, who thinks this?

That is true...  netstat behaves the same way on NT/2k as well.

-mrh



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message